She argues that drug courts mimic progressive era penal reforms in that they use the medical model to justify the expansion of the criminal justice system and that they inevitably default to coercion as a way of dealing with social problems like drug abuse crime and poverty addiction ideology plays a crucial role in facilitating the courts reliance on coercion as a primary mechanism of . Judging addicts examines this increased criminalization of drugs and the medicalization of addiction in the us by focusing on drug courts where defendants are sent to drug treatment instead of prison rebecca tiger explores how advocates of these courts make their case for what they call enlightened coercion detailing how they use medical theories of addiction to justify increased criminal . Judging addicts drug courts and coercion in the justice system alternative criminology 6 tiger rebecca on amazoncom free shipping on qualifying offers judging addicts drug courts and coercion in the justice system alternative criminology 6. Judging addicts examines this increased criminalization of drugs and the medicalization of addiction in the us by focusing on drug courts where defendants are sent to drug treatment instead of prison rebecca tiger explores how advocates of these courts make their case for what they call enlightened coercion detailing how they use medical theories of addiction to justify increased . Judging addicts examines this increased criminalization of drugs and the medicalization of addiction in the us by focusing on drug courts where defendants are sent to drug treatment instead of prison rebecca tiger explores how advocates of these courts make their case for what they call enlightened coercion detailing how they use medical theories of addiction to justify increased